I want to tell you about a switch I made two weeks ago, because it’s the kind of thing this newsletter exists for — not hype, just one person’s working system changing in a way that might matter to yours.

For two years my stack had three legs. Obsidian for notes. Coda for projects. Superlist for tasks. Clean on paper. In practice, I spent more time shuffling information between those three apps than actually using any of them. A note referenced a project that spawned a task, and keeping the three in sync was an unpaid part-time job I never applied for.

I’ve barely opened any of them since I started using Workflowy.

Before I go further — two things you deserve up front. I’ve applied to Workflowy’s affiliate program, so I have a reason to want you to like it. And I’m only two weeks in, which is long enough to feel a switch but not to know if it survives a hard quarter. Read accordingly.

Subscribe now

Here’s what actually changed — and it isn’t a feature.

Every app in my old stack could hold my notes, projects, and tasks. None could connect them without friction. I’d tuned Obsidian hard — daily notes, calendar plugin, a Kanban view, a wall of plugins — and the more I optimized, the clearer it got that I was building scaffolding to compensate for the fact that my project notes lived where my tasks didn’t. I even ran to Capacities for a week to fix it. Same wall, one app over.

Workflowy is the least impressive app of the bunch. It’s an outliner. Bullets inside bullets. That’s the pitch. But because everything is a bullet — note, project, goal, task, journal entry — connecting them isn’t something you configure. It’s just how the thing works. A task lives under a project, mirrors into today’s note, and carries a date, all without leaving the outline.

The friction I was building elaborate systems to manage? It’s just gone. That’s the whole story.

What’s carrying the weight day to day:

One daily note holds everything — work logs, journaling, idea capture, tasks, even my atomic essay drafts. A side-panel lets me review yesterday while writing today. Any list flips into a Kanban board and back with no migration. Mirroring keeps one task as a single source of truth across multiple places. And it’s genuinely good on Windows, Android, and iOS — my old stack never was, equally, everywhere.

Now the part most newsletters skip: don’t follow me if —

You think visually. Workflowy is text and bullets. No canvas, no graph, no spatial maps. If that’s how your brain works, it offers you nothing.

Your projects need real database power. Multiple linked tables and formulas? Workflowy will feel like a toy next to Coda or Notion. I could downgrade Coda only because my projects aren’t database-heavy. Yours might be.

Your current system already works. The cost of switching a working setup almost always beats the gain. I switched because mine wasn’t working — not because Workflowy beats everything.

And one honest flag: I’ve been living in the beta, so a few things I love may shift before they hit the stable app. Treat this as where Workflowy is heading, not a frozen spec.

The money part: Free plan is usable but capped at roughly 100 new bullets a month. Pro is $6.99/month (paid annually), removes the cap, and adds backlinks and advanced search. No per-user fees, no storage limits. One of the cheaper tools I pay for.

The verdict is simple. Workflowy didn’t win on features. It won by deleting the friction between the three apps I was already paying for. If a tangle of apps is the thing draining you, it’s worth a real trial. If your system already hums, keep it.

That’s where I am after two weeks. I’ll report back when I’ve stress-tested it past the honeymoon.

One question for you, and hit reply — I read everything: what’s the app in your stack you keep meaning to consolidate but haven’t? I’m curious whether I’m an outlier or whether everyone’s quietly drowning in the same three-app problem.

Talk soon, Kaushik

P.S. — If you do try it and it sticks, the trial will tell you within a day whether the bullet format clicks for you. It’s polarizing. You’ll know fast.

Disclosure: I’ve applied to Workflowy’s affiliate program. I pay for it with my own money and switched before applying.

Share

I want to tell you about a TEDx talk I watched this week, but first I have to admit something a little embarrassing.

I’ve spent years telling people which productivity app to download. Sixty-something reviews deep at this point. I have genuinely strong feelings about Sunsama versus Akiflow that I will share with you unprompted if you let me.

So you’d think I’d be the last person to say this. But here it is:

The system that actually runs my day has almost nothing to do with which app I’m using.

The talk was Samantha Lane’s — We’re Overcomplicating Time Management. She went through a medical crisis that forced her to rebuild how she related to time, from zero, and what she landed on was almost insultingly plain: prioritize, plan, protect. That’s it. No app in the framework at all.

I sat with that longer than I expected to, because it quietly argues against a thing I’ve spent a long time implicitly selling — that the next tool will be the one that finally makes the day work.

It won’t. I think I can finally say why.

Here’s what I used to believe: the problem is too many apps, and the fix is fewer apps.

That’s not actually what I’ve seen, in myself or in anyone I’ve watched use these tools for years. I’ve seen people run a completely calm day out of five apps. I’ve watched other people drown inside one.

The number was never the variable. The variable is whether each tool has a job — a specific moment of the day it owns, and only it.

Most of what feels like overwhelm isn’t too many apps. It’s ambiguity. You’ve got three places a task could live, so you burn energy deciding where it goes before you’ve even started the actual task. The tool that doesn’t have a clear job doesn’t save you a decision — it costs you one, every time you open it.

So I stopped asking “what can this app do.” Everything does everything now — every task app has a calendar view, every notes app wants to hold your tasks too. The only question that matters anymore: which moment of my day does this own?

For me there are really just a few moments, and each one gets exactly one home:

A moment to catch a thought before it’s gone — no deciding, just capture. (Mine’s voice, into Wispr Flow, straight into Obsidian.)

A moment to actually think, unfiltered, with nothing tidying it up behind me. That’s the one corner I deliberately keep free of any AI — my Obsidian vault stays a mess on purpose.

A moment, once a day, to look at everything I caught and admit most of it doesn’t deserve my time.

A moment to put what survives against actual hours — because a list tells you what could happen, a calendar tells you what can, and the gap between those two is where the overwhelm actually lives.

And a moment to just do the thing, off a list that’s already been decided, with no “let me reorganize my system first” — which is, let’s be honest, the most sophisticated form of procrastination either of us has ever invented.

Can I tell you the one change that mattered more than any app switch I’ve ever made?

I stopped letting my priorities live somewhere I had to go find them.

A priority you have to open an app and tap three times to see isn’t a priority. It’s a hope. The things that actually matter need to live somewhere your eyes land without trying.

This is just true in sales, which is my actual day job when I’m not writing to you. The loudest customer is almost never the one who matters most. The deep work never raises its hand and asks for attention — it just quietly loses to whatever’s shouting, every single time, unless you’ve physically put it somewhere you can’t avoid it.

And here’s the part the apps will never put in the marketing copy, because it doesn’t sell an upgrade:

Not everything gets done today. Your to-do list, if we’re honest, is a fantasy document — a list of everything you’d do with infinite time and zero other humans making claims on you. Neither of us has that.

A simple system isn’t one that helps you cram more in. It’s one that’s honest, before the day starts, about the fact that today has a ceiling — so you’re choosing on purpose instead of finding out at 9pm which eleven things didn’t make it.

Prioritize, plan, protect, like Lane said. I’d add a fourth, the one the practitioner in me had to learn the hard way: forgive the carryover. What rolls to tomorrow isn’t proof you failed today. It’s proof you had a finite day and didn’t lie to yourself about it.

So — what do you actually need? A place to catch a thought. A place to think without interference. A daily minute to be honest about what matters and put it against real hours. One list to actually work from. And your priorities somewhere your eyes can’t avoid.

That might be four apps for you. Might be two. Might be a notebook and a phone calendar.

The count was never the point. I spent years thinking it was.

I’ll ask you the question I’m still asking myself: what’s the one moment in your day that doesn’t have a clear home right now? Hit reply — I read all of these, and I’m genuinely curious where the ambiguity is hiding for you.

Talk soon, Kaushik

SystemsAndFlow

Quick confession before I get into today’s post: since I last wrote about Capacities, I’ve used three other apps. Kortex/Eden, Tana. And now I’m back on Obsidian for notes, Superlist for tasks, and Coda for the heavier project stuff.

Three apps. Three logins. Three places my brain lives.

And here I am, looking at Capacities again.

I want to be upfront about what this email is — and isn’t. It isn’t “I switched, here’s why you should too.” I haven’t switched. This is the more honest version: I’m seriously considering it, for the first time in over a year, and I’d rather think through it out loud with you than wait until I’ve made up my mind and dress it up as conviction.

How I got here

The short version: I left Tana for Capacities, mostly for project management. Then I drifted — Kortex for a while, Eden for a while, Fabric for a while, each promising some flavor of “AI-native all-in-one” that didn’t quite land. I ended up back on Obsidian because it’s local, it’s markdown, it’s mine. Superlist took tasks because it’s fast. Coda took project tracking and database-shaped problems.

It works. It’s just three things. Every time I’ve written about my “system” this past year, it’s been a system of connections between apps, not a system of work.

Subscribe now

What’s pulling me back

If you’ve been reading along, you know I’ve covered Capacities’ feature lineup in detail twice already. Short version: 2025 and 2026 turned it from “good PKM with potential” into something shipping recurring tasks, real deadlines, Kanban with group-by, a search engine they’ve rebuilt twice in four months, AI Chat Connectors (so Claude — the AI I already use — can read my own workspace), and bulk import that’s now open to everyone.

That last one is the quiet unlock. Bulk import has always been the wall between “interested in Capacities” and “actually moving my notes there.” If that wall’s really gone, the whole conversation changes.

Mapping my stack onto one app

Here’s where I have to be honest with myself, not just list features:

Obsidian is my long-term archive — years of notes, daily notes, a web of links I understand. This is the one I’m most nervous about. Capacities’ object model (notes, people, projects, books as distinct typed things) genuinely matches how I think better than Obsidian’s flat graph. But “matches how I think” isn’t the same as “worth re-platforming years of notes.”

Superlist is daily and recurring tasks, fast capture, checking things off. This is the part Capacities has closed the gap on most — recurring tasks with catch-up logic, a tags view on the task dashboard. Honestly, the lowest-stakes piece of my stack to move.

Coda is the heavier project tracking — basically a database with views. Capacities’ Kanban, group-by, and variable queries cover a chunk of that. The formula-driven, automation-heavy side of Coda I haven’t stress-tested at all — that’s probably where the real gap still is.

What’s actually holding me back

Not features. Two things.

One: migration cost is real, especially for Obsidian. Bulk import being open doesn’t tell me what survives the trip — backlinks, tags, folder structure, embeds. Haven’t tested it yet. Until I do, “Capacities can do everything” is a claim, not a fact.

Two: I’ve been here before. Twice. Both times I was genuinely excited before quietly drifting back within months. The thing I want to avoid isn’t picking the “wrong” tool — it’s becoming the person who writes “I’m switching to X” every six months and never settles. That’s not a system, that’s a hobby that looks like one.

Where I’m actually landing

A real migration test, not an afternoon of poking around. Superlist’s tasks move first — lowest stakes, most overlap, least attachment. If that sticks for a month, Coda’s project tracking is next. Obsidian — my actual archive — goes last, if at all, and only once I trust the export path back out.

I’ll tell you how it goes either way. If you’ve made a similar move — especially out of Obsidian — hit reply, I’d genuinely like to hear what survived and what didn’t.

Talk soon, SystemsAndFlow

Disclosure: I’m an affiliate for Capacities. Nothing here is a recommendation yet — it’s me thinking through a decision I haven’t made.

Share

You know my history with AI writing tools. I’ve been skeptical — loudly, repeatedly skeptical — about anything that tries to sit between me and the page.

I wrote an entire piece about keeping AI out of my Obsidian vault. I meant it. That boundary still stands.

So I want to be upfront with you: what I’m about to tell you surprised me too.

Subscribe now

I’ve been using an AI writing tool daily for the past few weeks. Voluntarily. And I haven’t wanted to stop.

The tool is called Eden. And the reason it works for me is simple — it doesn’t try to write for you.

I have an already active subscription of Eden (earlier Kortex) and this is an attempt to clear my head and start using this new Eden as a content creator.

Let me explain what I mean, because that distinction is everything.

What Most AI Writing Tools Get Wrong

They want to be the writer. They suggest your next sentence, finish your paragraph, turn your rough notes into polished copy. The output is clean. It sounds coherent. It just doesn’t sound like you.

I spent about a year testing this. Drafting with tools that autocompleted everything. Asking models to “sharpen” paragraphs before I’d even finished thinking them through. And at some point, my writing started to feel like meeting minutes from a conversation I wasn’t fully present for.

That’s when I went back to basics. Plain text. A blinking cursor. My own half-formed thoughts.

My voice came back. My thinking came back. And I assumed that was the end of AI in my writing process.

Then I tried Eden, and I had to update that assumption.

What Eden Actually Does

It doesn’t write. It researches, it structures, and it listens — and those three things turn out to be exactly what I needed.

It finds what’s already working. Eden indexes high-performing content across X, YouTube, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, and Substack. You can search by topic or format and see what’s actually resonating — with outlier scores showing how much a piece outperformed the average. You’re not guessing. You’re starting from data.

It breaks down why something worked. Paste in any post or video — yours or someone else’s — and Eden maps the structure: the hook, the beats, the payoff. Then it applies that structure to your idea. You’re not copying anyone. You’re learning the underlying pattern and using it yourself. Over time, you internalize it.

It learns your voice. You feed it links to your own writing — posts, newsletters, threads — and it builds a profile of how you actually write. Your rhythms, your vocabulary, the things you’d never say. When it gives you feedback or brainstorm suggestions, it speaks back in your register. Not LinkedIn-autopilot. You.

What Changed for Me

The parts of writing I used to dread — finding the angle, deciding if an idea is worth the words, staring at a blank page — are no longer the bottleneck.

I still do all the thinking. I still do all the writing. But the research and structure that used to slow me down? Eden handles that. And because it’s not trying to replace my voice, what comes out still feels like mine.

I keep AI out of my private Obsidian vault. That hasn’t changed. But for the work I publish — the essays, the ideas I want you to read — I’ve found a tool that helps me show up more consistently without watering down what I’m putting out.

If any of this resonates, it’s worth a look.

👉 Try Eden free for 7 days — no card required

Affiliate disclosure: I’m part of Eden’s affiliate program. If you sign up through the link above, I may earn a commission — at no cost to you. I’ve been using Eden daily for weeks. I wouldn’t write about it otherwise.

See you next week,

Stay Productive, keep writing.

Kaushik/SystemsAndFlow

Share

Hey friend,

Quick confession before your week starts.

I have Claude open right now. I used three different AI tools yesterday (not seriously, just checking Gemini on my pixel). I’ll probably use one before I finish writing this letter to you.

Subscribe now

But there’s one place in my workflow where I’ve quietly drawn a line — my Obsidian vault. No co-pilot. No autocomplete. No “improve this paragraph.” Just me, the cursor, and whatever half-thought I caught on the way to the kitchen.

It wasn’t a principled decision. I didn’t sit down one day and decide to protect my thinking from the machines. It happened slowly, the way most real changes do.

For about a year, I’d been letting AI sit closer and closer to my writing. Drafting with suggestions on. Asking for “tightening” before I’d finished the thought. Pasting half-formed ideas into chat windows for feedback. It felt productive. Every session ended cleaner than it started.

But I’d open my notes a week later and not quite recognize the thinking inside them. The sentences were mine. The shape wasn’t.

That’s the part that took me a while to name.

When I finally settled on Obsidian — after the embarrassingly long tour of sixty-plus apps — one thing started doing quiet work in the background. There’s nothing in there waiting to finish my sentence. Nothing nudging me toward the average phrasing. The vault is just… quiet.

And three things came back that I hadn’t realized I’d lost.

The weird half-formed thoughts I would have let a model “fix.” (Half my best essays started as a sentence I’d have edited out.)

The feeling of being stuck — and then unstuck. Not by clicking regenerate, but by sitting with the wrong question long enough to find the right one.

And, strangest of all, conversations with old versions of myself. Re-reading notes from February and noticing I disagree with what I believed in August. A model summarizing those notes for me would have flattened that. Re-reading them did something else.

I’m not writing this to tell you AI is bad for thinking. I use it constantly. I’m writing it because I think most of us haven’t asked ourselves the more useful question:

Where in your workflow are you supposed to be the one doing the thinking?

Mark that part. Keep AI out of just that part. Let it back in everywhere else.

For me, it’s the empty markdown file at 6 AM with my coffee. For you, it might be a paper notebook, a voice memo on a walk, the back of an envelope. The format doesn’t matter. The protected space does.

That turned out to be the thing I’d been missing.

See you next week,

Stay Productive, keep writing.

Kaushik/SystemsAndFlow

P.S. If you write back and tell me where your protected space is, I’ll read every reply. Genuinely curious.

Share

A short, honest one this week.

If you’ve been reading SystemsAndFlow for any length of time, you know I’ve covered 60+ productivity apps. What I haven’t talked about as openly is how many of them were silently auto-renewing on my card without doing real work for me.

Earlier this year I sat down with my bank statement and counted five productivity subscriptions I hadn’t opened in over a month. The honest reaction wasn’t guilt. It was what is this still doing on my card?

So I cancelled them. Then I waited to see if my output cratered.

It didn’t. It got faster.

This is the short version of what I cut, what I kept, and a few industry signals I noticed afterwards that made me feel less alone in the call.

Subscribe now

The five I walked away from

Todoist. Years of loyalty. But by mid-2025, the labels and filters had become a system to maintain instead of a system that worked. The tipping point was a Monday morning when I genuinely couldn’t decide what was urgent because everything had three labels. That’s not a tool problem — that’s a tool built for someone who wants to think about tasks, not do them.

Sunsama. This one hurt. The daily ritual is beautiful. But sitting down for a “thoughtful daily plan” only works when your day is plannable. Mine isn’t. Customer escalations and engineer pings tear up my morning by 10:30. The ritual became a form of pretending. When the calendar doesn’t reflect reality, the calendar isn’t the problem.

Tana. The most powerful tool I’ve ever used. Also the one that wanted me to think about how to think every time I opened it. I’d open Tana to capture a meeting note and lose forty minutes redesigning a supertag schema. Cognitive overhead I stopped being able to afford on evenings and weekends.

Fabric.so. Beautiful capture, almost zero retrieval. I was saving into Fabric, never pulling from it. When I needed customer notes I went straight to Obsidian or Coda. A capture tool you don’t withdraw from is just a savings account you never visit.

Eden.so. Smart product. But I already pay for Claude, and Claude does almost everything Eden was offering for me. Two AI layers stacked on top of each other was just overlap with a price tag.

The three that earned their seat

Obsidian is where my thinking lives — and yes, I have deliberately kept AI out of it. Every notes app on the market is racing to bolt AI onto your notes. After reviewing enough of them I’ll say it plainly: when AI starts surfacing and “connecting” your notes for you, you stop thinking through them. The friction of articulating an idea is the whole point of writing it down. AI smooths the friction, which is the same as smoothing the thought. Obsidian gives me the canvas, the local files, the structure. The thinking is mine.

Coda is what most people want Notion to be when they’re managing real work. My territory plans, customer pipelines, quarterly reviews, and editorial calendar all live here. For a B2B operator who tracks structured information that other people consume, nothing comes close right now.

Superlist is the speed layer. Capture-to-organized time is roughly half what it was in Todoist. The mobile app is genuinely fast. The list of features it doesn’t have is itself a feature.

Capture sits on top of all three: Wispr Flow lets me dictate straight into whatever window is open — voice into Obsidian for notes, into Superlist for tasks, into a Coda inbox for thoughts to develop later. Same tool, three destinations, no friction.

The signals that say I made the right call

Two things I noticed after I made the cuts that quietly confirmed them, and that I didn’t see coming:

Eden’s pivot announcement this week. Their team admitted publicly that AI-credit costs broke them and forced a major rebuild — they let go of more than half the team and pivoted to a content-creator-focused outlier discovery tool. That’s a brutally candid public letter and worth reading if you’ve ever wondered how self-funded productivity startups handle the unit economics of AI. (More on this in next week’s post — I’ll be revisiting the new Eden properly, but this time as a writer rather than a B2B operator. I’ve signed up for their affiliate program for that reason.)

Tana’s product split. Tana itself has now split into two: the flagship is moving toward an AI meeting notes app, and the original outliner experience is being preserved as Tana Outliners. Even Tana decided the all-things-to-everyone version was hard to keep as a primary direction. I’ll let you draw your own conclusions, but it lined up uncomfortably well with the reasons I left.

The honest math

Roughly ₹X per month back in my account. The bigger win — 30–45 minutes a day I used to spend on meta-work (grooming labels, redesigning schemas, planning tomorrow’s perfect day) is now spent on actual work or genuinely closing the laptop.

Three tools is enough decision-making. Eight is a soft, constant tax on attention.

The takeaway, if you want one

The best productivity stack isn’t the most powerful one. It’s the one you stop noticing.

Obsidian, Coda, Superlist, with Wispr Flow on top, has disappeared into the background of my work. That’s the highest compliment I can give a tool.

If you’re staring at your own bank statement this week — start cancelling. You’ll be surprised what survives.

Hit reply and tell me what you’ve cancelled this year. I read every email — those notes are usually where my next post starts.

Stay productive,

— Kaushik / SystemsAndFlow

A note on affiliates: I’m an affiliate for Superlist, and Wispr Flow — these has earned the recommendation by surviving the cuts. I’ve also signed up for the new Eden’s affiliate program, even though I cancelled the old Eden in this very post. They’re different products with different audiences, and I’ll only recommend the new one after I’ve actually used it. Full transparency is the only thing keeping this newsletter worth reading.

P.S. Next week: a closer look at the Eden pivot — what it tells you about every other “AI-native productivity” subscription still on your card.

Share

Quick disclosure: this post contains an affiliate link to Wispr Flow. If you sign up through it, I may receive a small credit at no extra cost to you. I'd recommend Wispr either way — it's the single biggest change to how I capture ideas, and the affiliate is just a nice-to-have.

TL;DR I’ve spent four years bouncing between notes apps. The honest result: a graveyard of folders I never re-opened. This year I changed approach — capture less, trust memory more, use the simplest tool. My whole stack now is voice-to-text into plain markdown files. That’s it.

Subscribe now

I’ve been using notes apps for about four years now, and somewhere along the way, I quietly stopped using them the way I started.

In the beginning, I captured everything. Every meeting got a note. Every fleeting thought went into an inbox. Every book I planned to read, every blog I wanted to revisit, every atomic essay idea, every quote that struck me — all of it landed somewhere. Apple Notes, then Notion, then Tana, then Obsidian, then back again. Each new app promised to be the one that would finally make sense of the pile.

The pile only got bigger.

Here’s what I’ve come to believe: most of us are not building second brains. We’re building note graveyards. Folders we never re-open. Daily notes that get more daily and less noted. Reading lists that grow faster than we read. Meeting notes whose half-life is shorter than the meeting itself. The capture is easy; the return on capture is almost zero.

So this year I changed my approach. I stopped trying to capture everything. I take far fewer meeting notes now — just the decisions and the next actions, and only when they actually need to be written down. I let most fleeting thoughts pass. If a thought is important, it comes back. If it doesn’t come back, it probably wasn’t.

What surprised me is how much lighter this feels — and how little I’ve lost.

The apps keep moving

The other thing that’s shifted is the apps themselves. The tools I fell in love with have all started chasing the same thing.

Tana, which I used as a flexible outliner and notes app, has steadily repositioned itself around AI meeting assistance. Amie, which I adopted because it was the cleanest, most opinionated calendar and planner I’d seen, is increasingly an AI meeting-notes product.

Every productivity tool seems to be on the same conveyor belt: start as a focused notes or planning tool, add an AI meeting layer, slowly become a meeting-summary app with a calendar attached.

I don’t blame them — there’s clearly money in meeting AI. But the apps that helped me think are now mostly helping me document. That’s a different job.

The Tiago Forte tweet

Which brings me to a tweet I keep thinking about. Tiago Forte — the person who literally wrote the book on Building a Second Brain — recently asked the internet:

“Can anyone recommend a dead simple, easy to use notetaking app based on markdown files? Obsidian is far too complicated for me. I’m looking for Apple Notes, but with markdown storage.”

Read that again. The person behind the most influential personal-knowledge-management framework of the last decade is asking for “Apple Notes but with markdown.”

If he is over the graphs, the queries, and the plugin marketplace — the rest of us can probably stop pretending we need them either.

We’ve been sold the idea that notes should be a system. Tags. Backlinks. Daily notes. PARA. Maps of content. The system was supposed to make our thinking compound. For most people it just made the act of taking a note more expensive — and the act of returning to one even more so.

What notes are actually for

The point of a note is to be useful again. That’s it.

If the friction to write it is high, you don’t write it. If the friction to find it is high, you don’t return to it. Every feature that doesn’t reduce one of those two frictions is, for most people, a tax.

Apple Notes is popular for a reason. It opens fast. You type. It saves. You search. It’s not romantic, but it gets used. Compare that to the apps we admire — the ones with the beautiful graphs and the carefully nested hierarchies — which we open less and less, and mostly on Sunday afternoons when we feel guilty about the backlog.

My current setup (the actual stack)

After four years of trying everything, I’ve collapsed my stack down to two things.

1. Wispr Flow — for capture

I don’t open a notes app to capture an idea anymore. I just speak.

Wispr turns voice into clean text wherever my cursor happens to be — Slack, email, browser, code editor, anywhere. The bar for “writing a thought down” has dropped to almost zero.

The interesting side effect: voice is itself an importance filter. When I have to type a thought, I capture indiscriminately. When I have to actually say a thought out loud, I only bother with the ones that feel worth saying.

The app I was looking for, it turns out, wasn’t a better notes app. It was a faster way in.

2. Obsidian — but only as a folder of .md files

The second is Obsidian, but stripped back to what it actually is: a folder of plain markdown files.

• No plugins.

• No graph view.

• No tagging system.

• No daily notes template.

I open a .md file on my PC, or the same file in the browser when I’m away from my machine, and I write. The format outlives the app. If Obsidian goes the way of Tana or Amie tomorrow, my notes don’t go with it.

That’s the whole system. Voice in. Markdown out. Less app, more thinking.

Where I’ve landed

So here’s the place I’ve reached, four years in:

Capture less. Trust your memory more. Use the simplest tool that lets you write a thought down and find it later. Be suspicious of any app that wants to do more than that — especially if its newest feature is an AI that listens to your meetings.

The best notes app I have right now is the one I forget I’m using.

That, I think, is the whole bar.

Over to you

I’m curious — what does your notes stack look like in 2026? Have you also been quietly capturing less? Or is your second brain still going strong?

Drop a comment below — I read all of them, and I’m collecting recommendations for a follow-up post on what people are actually using (not what they say they should be).

If this resonated, the easiest way to support the writing is to share it with one person whose notes app is suspiciously named “Inbox.”

And if you’re new here — I write weekly-ish about tools, productivity, and the quiet ways our software shapes how we think. Subscribe to get the next one in your inbox.

As always, thank you for reading. Means a lot that you’re here.

Keep going.

— Kaushik / SystemsAndFlow

Tiago Forte’s original tweet is here on X.

Subscribe now

Hey,

Last week I had a customer review that lasted exactly 30 minutes.

Thirty minutes on the clock. And then three days of work that followed from it — a revised proposal, an internal technical discussion and call I hadn’t planned for, a pricing summary that went through four drafts before I sent it.

I sat back after it was all done and thought — that one call basically wrote my entire week.

And here’s the honest thing I want to share with you this week: I wasn’t bothered by it. Because every bit of that post-meeting work felt purposeful. I knew why I was doing it. It was moving something forward.

That’s when it hit me — we’ve been thinking about meetings all wrong.

Subscribe now

The productivity world loves to say meetings are a waste of time. “This could’ve been an email.” “Meetings steal your deep work hours.” I’ve nodded along to all of it. Still do, sometimes.

But managing a sales team has taught me something that’s hard to learn from a productivity book: the meeting itself is rarely the problem. The work it generates is.

When a meeting ends well, you walk out with a clear head and a short list of things that genuinely matter. The follow-up work feels almost easy — you know what it is, you know why it exists, you know who’s doing it.

When a meeting ends badly — vague, undecided, slightly uncomfortable — the aftermath is a different animal entirely. Threads asking “wait, what did we agree on?” Internal messages trying to reconstruct decisions nobody wrote down. Action items that sit in someone’s head and quietly die there.

Same thirty minutes. Completely different three days.

I started asking myself one question before any important meeting now:

What work do I want this meeting to create?

Not what topics do I want to cover. Not what’s on the agenda. But what should the people in this conversation walk away actually doing?

It sounds almost too simple. But preparing with that question in mind changes everything — how I open the meeting, what I push to decide vs. park, and how I close it.

And after the call? I give myself five minutes — right then, while it’s all still fresh — to write down three things in my notes: the outcome, the decisions, the next steps with names attached. Five minutes. It saves hours of confusion later.

Because here’s what I’ve noticed: if you don’t capture the why behind a decision while you still remember it, the follow-up work eventually feels like busywork. And busywork is what makes people say “ugh, that meeting was pointless.”

The meeting wasn’t pointless. You just lost the thread.

Wispr Flow makes it even more easy, just talk to my Pixel or Dell Latitude. And the meeting brief is there in my Obsidian Daily Notes and Coda (if 'its a project).

So does a meeting ever really end?

Probably not. It ends when everything it set in motion is done. And I’ve made peace with that.

The goal was never to have meetings that create no work. That would mean nothing got decided and nothing’s moving. The goal is to have meetings that create the right work — work you can do with clarity and confidence.

That’s the version of “productive meeting” nobody really talks about. It’s not shorter. It’s not fewer. It’s just — better designed.

Worth thinking about this week.

One small thing to try before your next important meeting:

Write this sentence before you walk in: “After this meeting, I want [person] to be able to do [specific thing].”

If you can’t fill it in, you’re not ready yet.

As always, thank you for reading. Means a lot that you’re here.

Keep going.

— Kaushik / SystemsAndFlow

Share

Hey,

About a month ago, I wrote about Wispr Flow and why it finally felt like a voice tool worth trusting. That post was about the product — what it does, why the Android launch mattered, why the accuracy was different.

This one is about what happened after.

Because there’s always a gap between “this is impressive” and “this is actually part of how I work now.” Most tools don’t make it across that gap. Wispr Flow did — but not quite in the way I expected.

A bit of context on my setup

My notes world is split between two apps: Coda for everything project-related (meetings, planning, client work), and Obsidian for personal PKM — book notes, ideas, the kind of thinking that doesn’t belong to any project.

Before Wispr Flow, getting things into either app required me to be at my desk, typing. Ideas that came on a commute, between meetings, or mid-walk either got lost or ended up in a voice memo I’d “process later.” You know how that goes.

What changed in Obsidian

This is where the habit formed first, and fastest.

I open Obsidian on Android, tap into my daily note, and speak. What shows up reads like a note — not a raw transcript. The friction that made voice capture feel like extra work is just gone.

The shift I didn’t anticipate: I capture more and filter less. I used to mentally edit before typing — deciding if something was worth writing down. Now I capture first and decide later. My daily notes are richer for it.

I also stopped using the Obsidian voice plugin I’d been trying. Wispr Flow is better because it’s not an Obsidian feature — it works at the system level. It doesn’t care what app I’m in.

What changed in Coda

Coda took a bit longer, but this is where Wispr Flow has saved me the most actual time.

My old meeting notes process: rough shorthand during the meeting, cleanup session afterward to organize everything into the Coda project doc. That cleanup was supposed to happen right after the meeting. It usually happened the next morning, if at all.

Now: I open the Coda doc before the meeting, and immediately after — sometimes still in the room — I speak through what happened. Decisions, action items, key context. Wispr Flow types while I talk. I fix a sentence or two. Done.

Three minutes instead of twenty. And because I’m doing it while it’s fresh, the notes are actually better than what I used to produce typing from memory later.

The workflow I’ve settled into: lightweight shorthand during the meeting, then speak the substance after. It’s made meeting notes go from something I dreaded to something I don’t think about.

The habit that surprised me

I started using it for things I never planned to — Slack replies I was putting off, quick task updates, roughing out sections of a blog post when the thought was there but the time wasn’t.

Once the muscle memory forms in one context, you start reaching for it everywhere. Not because you’re forcing it. It’s just there, and it works.

What didn’t change

Intentional, structured writing still happens at the desk, typing. When word choice matters — a planning doc, something that needs precision — speaking doesn’t help. The speed advantage disappears, and editing spoken prose takes longer than just writing carefully.

Wispr Flow didn’t make me someone who never types. It made me someone who types for the right things and speaks for the right things. That’s actually the ideal outcome. The tool found its lane.

Worth it?

If you read the first post and thought “I’ll try it when I have time” — the habit actually forms. The free tier is a real way to evaluate it, and the 14-day Pro trial requires no card.

For Android users especially, this is worth fifteen minutes of your time. Set it up inside an app you already use every day and see what happens.

The real test of any tool isn’t the first week. It’s whether it’s still part of your workflow a month later. Wispr Flow passed that test — quietly, without fanfare. Which is exactly how the best tools earn their place.

Try Wispr Flow free for 14 days → Mac, Windows, iPhone, Android. No card required.

Disclosure: affiliate link — I was a paying user before I became an affiliate.

That’s it for this week. If this was useful, forward it to someone who’s still drowning in unprocessed voice memos.

See you next week.

— Astu

If someone forwarded this to you — welcome! You can subscribe here.

Find me on X · Medium · Buy me a coffee

Hey there,

Let me ask you something:

When you wake up tomorrow and sit down to work — where do you go first?

Not which app you check out of habit. Not where notifications pull you. But the one place where you decide, “This is what matters today, and here is how I will get it done.”

That place — if you have one — is your sacred space for personal productivity.

I have been chasing mine for years. And I think I am finally getting close.

Subscribe now

The problem with not having one

Without a sacred space, our mornings look like this:

Open the calendar for a meeting time. Notice a Slack or a WhatsApp ping. Remember a task we forgot. Open the notes app. Get pulled into email. Twenty minutes gone, nothing moved forward.

We are not lazy. We are scattered. And the scattering happens because there is no single anchor — no lighthouse that says, “Start here. Everything you need is here.”

A sacred space is that anchor. One place where your focused effort, your top priority, and your quick captures all live together. No app-jumping. No context-switching. Just clarity.

Simple idea. Surprisingly hard to find.

My journey so far

Phase 1: The Calendar

I was a calendar person for a long time. Time-blocking. Color codes. Every hour accounted for. It felt clean and controlled.

Then remote work happened. Home-office days where a “9 AM deep work” block disappears to a real-life interruption. Travel weeks where my calendar looks like modern art across time zones. The structure that helped me started fighting me.

Calendars are brilliant for commitments with others. For personal productivity? Too rigid.

Phase 2: The Task Manager

I moved to Todoist. Writing ideas, meeting plans, daily to-dos — everything went into one app. It worked as a “sacred space” for a while.

But here is what I learned: a task manager is built for doing, not for thinking. There is no room to develop an idea, to reflect, to write something that does not have a checkbox next to it.

I needed a space that could hold action and thought.

Where I am now: two contenders

Superlist — the action space

I recently switched to Superlist as my primary task manager and I wrote about that transition a few weeks ago. What earned it a place in this conversation is not just the speed or the design (though both are excellent). It is how it connects notes to tasks.

A to-do is not just a line item anymore. It carries context. A rough meeting agenda lives inside the task itself. A half-formed blog idea sits in my idea inbox. Superlist lets me capture without breaking flow — and that matters more than most feature comparisons will tell you.

Obsidian — the thinking space

If Superlist is where I act, Obsidian is where I think.

I came to Obsidian wanting one thing: a simple notes app that syncs reliably between my laptop and my Pixel. What I found was a daily practice that might be the best productivity habit I have built.

Every day, one note. Ideas, work pointers, meeting takeaways, random observations — it all goes into today’s daily note. And then I connect it. A client problem links to the project note. A blog idea connects to my writing folder. Nothing is lost. Nothing is forced into a structure before it is ready.

For someone whose work spans technical writing, field engineering, and creative projects, this freedom is not nice-to-have. It is essential.

So which one wins?

Neither. Both. I am still experimenting.

But here is what I have realized: the sacred space is less about the tool and more about the practice. It is the discipline of going to one place, first thing, and trusting it.

My current practice looks like this:

→ 3 tasks for the day (no more) → A daily note for everything that is not a task → A quick morning intention and an evening reflection → One weekly review to connect the dots

Whether this lives in Superlist, Obsidian, or something entirely new — that is the experiment running right now.

A little tease

I have been quietly building something on the side. A simple web app — developed with the help of Claude and Lovable — that tries to bring these ideas into one personal space. Not a product for everyone. Just a tool that works for me.

It is early. It is rough. But it is the most interesting productivity experiment I have been part of.

More on that in a future edition.

Your turn: What is your sacred space? A specific app? A physical notebook? A whiteboard? Or are you still looking? Hit reply — I read every response.

Until next week, Kaushik

Systems & Flow — a weekly letter on tools, systems, and workflows that actually work.

Disclosure: This post contains an affiliate link for Superlist. I use it daily and recommend it because I mean it — the small commission is a bonus, not the reason.

Share

Let me set the scene.

It’s 8:30 AM. You have twelve tasks staring at you, three meetings before noon, and a Slack thread that somehow became a project. You open your productivity app. What happens next determines whether you actually get things done — or spend the next 20 minutes organizing things to get done.

That’s the real test. Not the feature list. Not the AI demo on YouTube. The 8:30 AM test.

I’ve put both Akiflow and Superlist through that test — repeatedly. And in 2026, with AI now baked into both of them, the gap between these two tools has never been more interesting.

Subscribe now

A Quick Word Before We Start

Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links for both Akiflow and Superlist. If you click and sign up, I may earn a small commission — at no extra cost to you. I only recommend tools I’ve genuinely used and believe in. My opinions remain my own.

The Two Tools, in Plain English

Before we go deeper, here’s the honest framing:

Akiflow is a power planner — built for people who want their calendar, tasks, and AI all talking to each other, in one consolidated command center. It’s the tool for the executive mindset: “Show me everything. Help me prioritize. Block my time.”

Superlist is a fast, clean, beautifully intuitive task manager — built for people who just want to move. It has AI too, but the soul of Superlist is speed and clarity. It gets out of your way.

I use Superlist. But here’s the thing — I completely understand why you might choose Akiflow.

My Experience with Akiflow

I first wrote about Akiflow a while back and called it a crucial tool for mastering daily life. That still holds.

What Akiflow does exceptionally well is consolidation. If your day involves juggling Google Calendar, multiple projects, deep work blocks, and integrations across tools like Notion, Todoist, or Trello — Akiflow brings all of that under one roof. You don’t have to context-switch. Everything is right there.

Image Courtesy: Akiflow

Time blocking on Akiflow is genuinely great. You can drag tasks right onto your calendar, visually plan your entire week, and it just sticks. There’s a satisfying sense of control when your day looks structured and intentional.

And then there’s Aki — the AI assistant inside Akiflow. In 2026, Aki has grown beyond a gimmick. You can ask it things like:

“Aki, plan my week and highlight any conflicts with my critical meetings.”

It will give you a proactive morning summary, flag scheduling conflicts, help reschedule tasks in natural language, and even automate recurring routines. It’s like having a very well-organized, very tireless assistant who lives inside your calendar.

One feature worth calling out specifically: Akiflow’s Meeting Assistant. Before a meeting, it surfaces relevant tasks and context so you walk in prepared. After, it helps you capture notes and automatically turns them into action items — correctly dated, linked to the right project. If you’re someone whose day is dominated by back-to-back meetings, this is genuinely valuable.

I genuinely liked the daily planning and review structure inside Akiflow. The analytics, the focus mode, the reporting — for the right person, this is a powerful setup.

But here’s where I started to feel the friction.

The power of Akiflow requires you to think in its system. Time blocking works best when you commit to it. The integrations reward you only when your workflow is complex enough to justify them. If you live in your calendar and thrive on structure, this is a dream. If you just want to get tasks done quickly on the go — the overhead starts to feel like work.

My Experience with Superlist

I’ve been on Superlist for a while now, and the relationship has only gotten better.

Let me be direct: I didn’t choose Superlist because of the AI. The AI features are good — Voice AI that turns spoken thoughts into tasks, meeting notes that generate action items automatically. Genuinely useful stuff. But that’s not why I’m here.

I chose Superlist because of how it feels to use it.

Opening Superlist is fast. Adding a task is fast. Moving through my lists is fast. There’s no learning curve taxation every time I open the app. It just... works. And for someone who already has a project management layer (I use Coda for that) and a separate writing and notes environment (Obsidian), I don’t need my task manager to be clever. I need it to be quick and dependable.

The design is clean and intuitive in a way that makes you want to capture things. You know that feeling when an app just clicks? That’s Superlist for me.

After 20+ months with it across updates, Superlist has become the task layer I trust — not because it impresses me, but because it never gets in my way.

Here’s the thing I keep coming back to: Superlist gives you a space to drop ideas and notes directly inside the task itself. Not in a linked document. Not in a sidebar. Right there, living alongside the task. Instead of a bare to-do item, each task can carry its own context — rough ideas, quick thoughts, links, fragments of thinking. It becomes a container, not just a checkbox. That combination of speed + aesthetics + depth inside the task is genuinely rare.

The Voice AI is genuinely one of the better implementations I’ve tried — you talk, it creates structured tasks with context and intent intact. And the Meeting Notes feature works better than I expected. You get a dedicated space to capture your meeting, and Superlist automatically extracts action items and turns them into tasks. No copy-pasting, no reformatting.

But my personal answer is simpler: Superlist fits my use case, my speed, and my existing system. And that matters more than any feature list.

Head-to-Head: Where They Actually Differ

Speed of use: Superlist wins. No contest.

Consolidated view + calendar integration: Akiflow wins. It’s built for this.

AI assistance for planning: Akiflow’s Aki is more proactive and contextual. Superlist’s AI is more reactive and task-focused.

Meeting assistance: Both have this — but they approach it differently. Akiflow’s Meeting Assistant is deeply integrated with your calendar and task system. Superlist’s Meeting Notes is simpler and faster. If meetings run your day, Akiflow is more comprehensive. If you just want to get out of a meeting without losing anything, Superlist handles it beautifully.

Notes and context inside tasks: Superlist wins here. The depth-inside-the-task approach is a real differentiator.

Design and feel: Both are excellent — but they appeal to different aesthetics. Akiflow feels like a command center. Superlist feels like a clean notepad that thinks.

Cross-platform: Superlist has the edge for mobile-first users.

Learning curve: Superlist is almost zero. Akiflow rewards investment but asks for it upfront.

Integrations: Akiflow is built around integrations. Superlist has them, but it’s not the core pitch.

Best For

Akiflow is best for:

• Professionals and executives who want everything in one place — tasks, calendar, meetings, priorities

• People who live by time blocking and want to visually own their week

• Anyone who wants AI to proactively help them plan — not just assist, but suggest, restructure, and flag

• Teams with complex workflows across multiple tools (Notion, Trello, Google Calendar, Outlook)

• Meeting-heavy professionals who need pre-meeting context and seamless post-meeting follow-through

• People willing to invest time into the system to get maximum return

Superlist is best for:

• People who value speed, simplicity, and a clean interface above all else

• Anyone who wants a task manager that doesn’t require a setup ritual

• Individuals who already have a project system and need a fast, reliable task layer

• People who want to capture ideas and context directly inside their tasks

• Mobile-forward users who want seamless cross-platform experience

• People who want AI as a quiet enhancement — not the centerpiece of the tool

So, Which One Should You Choose?

Here’s my honest advice.

If your day is calendar-heavy, if you’re managing multiple priorities across tools, and if the idea of an AI that proactively plans your week genuinely excites you — go with Akiflow. The consolidated view alone is worth it. And Aki, in 2026, is genuinely impressive.

If you’re someone who just wants to capture, organize, and move — without the overhead of a full planning system — Superlist is your answer. It’s the tool that respects your time before you even open it.

The best productivity tool isn’t the one with the most features. It’s the one you actually open at 8:30 AM and use without thinking.

For me, that’s Superlist. Every single day.

Thanks for reading.

Until next time, Kaushik

Share

I write about personal productivity systems, tools, and workflows at SystemsAndFlow. If you’ve been through your own app-hopping journey, I’d love to hear where you landed.

If you’re the kind of person who reads a comparison, in-depth review like this before committing to a tool — this newsletter is for you.

Systems & Flow is a weekly deep-dive into productivity systems that actually work in the real world. App reviews, tool comparisons, and practical frameworks built from 20 years in industrial sales. No fluff. No generic advice.

→ Subscribe here — one email a week, worth the read.

So… I did something I never thought I’d do.

I left Todoist.

If you’ve been reading me for a while, you know how much I’ve defended that app. Three-plus years of daily use. Multiple attempts at switching to TickTick, Things 3, even Tana. And I always—always—came crawling back to Todoist.

But a few weeks ago, something shifted. And now I’m writing this from the other side, fully moved to an app called Superlist.

Let me explain.

Subscribe now

First, Some Context

This year has been weird for my productivity setup.

I went back to Obsidian after years away—and I’m obsessed. The freedom of plain markdown, the future-proofing, not having to stress about where to “file” a thought. It just works for my brain now.

I also said goodbye to Tana. Didn’t renew. Great tool, but I was overengineering everything.

And somewhere in all this simplifying, I started questioning whether Todoist was still the right fit.

Not because it’s bad—it’s genuinely excellent. The team is doing exciting stuff (Goals feature coming soon, better attachment handling, task creation from images). But I realized I wasn’t looking for more anymore.

I was looking for less.

Enter Superlist

I’d tried Superlist before. Maybe a year ago? It didn’t stick. I don’t even remember why—probably some missing feature that I thought was essential.

This time, I gave it six weeks. A real trial. Using it alongside my paid Todoist subscription (which, by the way, I still have eight months left on—classic me).

And somewhere around week three, I stopped opening Todoist entirely.

Here’s what got me:

It’s fast. Like, weirdly fast. Every interaction—creating a task, switching lists, adding a note—feels instant. I didn’t realize how much micro-friction I’d been tolerating until it was gone.

Tasks and notes live together. This is the killer feature for me. My work involves a lot of context-switching: different teams, different projects, meeting notes, follow-ups. Before, I was bouncing between my task manager and a notes app constantly. Now everything lives in one place. A task can hold detailed notes. A note can spawn tasks. It just... flows.

The design doesn’t fight you. Clean. Minimal. No visual clutter. You open the app and immediately feel like getting things done.

My New Setup (It’s Embarrassingly Simple)

Here’s what my daily system looks like now:

• Obsidian → for thinking, personal knowledge, writing

• Coda → for projects, resources, meeting notes, reference material

• Superlist → for what needs to happen today

That’s it. Three tools. Clear boundaries.

Obsidian is where ideas live. Coda is where projects get tracked. Superlist is the daily action layer.

And honestly? This might be the simplest my system has ever been.

The Mindset Shift That Matters More

Here’s what I’ve been sitting with lately:

I was capturing too much and doing too little.

I’ve tried all the AI meeting note tools. Tana, mem, Amy, Wispr Flow (still using as a top-capture layer with Coda & Obsidian). The promise is seductive: transcribe everything, have searchable notes from every conversation, never lose context.

In practice? I almost never went back to those transcripts. They just accumulated. Data for the sake of data.

So now I’m intentionally staying light:

• 3 tasks per day (maximum & top priority)

• Plan only 4 weeks ahead

• Everything else sits in Coda until I need it

• 2 daily reflections

• 1 weekly review

That’s the system. Boring, I know. But boring is underrated.

About That Affiliate Link

If you want to try Superlist, here’s my referral: superli.st/kaushik-trivedi

Full transparency: I might earn a small commission if you sign up through that link. But I’d be recommending this app either way—it’s genuinely shifted how I work.

Start with the free plan. That’s what I used for the first six weeks, and it’s more than enough to know if it clicks for you.

One Last Thing

I don’t know if Superlist will be my forever app. (Is there such a thing?)

But right now, it fits. It matches where I am in 2026: less chasing tools, more using them. Less capturing, more doing. Less complexity, more clarity.

Sometimes change isn’t about finding something better. It’s about finding something that fits now.

That’s Superlist for me.

What’s your current task management setup? Have you made any big tool switches this year? Hit reply—I actually read every response.

Until next time, Kaushik

P.S. — If you want more context on Superlist’s features, I wrote about it last year: Superlist 2025: From Premium To-Do App to AI-Powered Productivity Powerhouse

I write about personal productivity systems, tools, and workflows at SystemsAndFlow. If you’ve been through your own app-hopping journey, I’d love to hear where you landed.

If you’re the kind of person who reads a comparison, in-depth review like this before committing to a tool — this newsletter is for you.

Systems & Flow is a weekly deep-dive into productivity systems that actually work in the real world. App reviews, tool comparisons, and practical frameworks built from 20 years in industrial sales. No fluff. No generic advice.

→ Subscribe here — one email a week, worth the read.

Something I didn’t expect when I started using Wispr Flow: the biggest change wasn’t speed.

It was that I stopped second-guessing what I was going to write before I wrote it. When you’re typing, there’s this low-grade friction between the thought and the text — you kind of pre-edit in your head as your fingers move. Speaking removes that. You think out loud, and something reasonably close to what you meant actually appears.

I’ve tried voice dictation tools before. My experience with all of them was the same: impressive for ten minutes, abandoned by Tuesday. Too many corrections, too many places. Too many “um”s in my Slack messages. The gap between what I said and what I meant to say was always too wide to make it worth it.

Wispr Flow closed that gap enough that I kept going.

Subscribe now

What makes it different

It’s not just transcription. Flow edits while you speak — catches filler words, understands when you change your mind mid-sentence, formats lists, adds punctuation from context. The output is the clean version, not the raw one.

It also works in every app without switching modes. Gmail, Notion, WhatsApp, Cursor — same experience everywhere. I stopped thinking about whether it would work and just used it. That’s a bigger deal than it sounds.

The personalization adds up too. Correct a word once, it’s remembered. Add your industry terms, your product names, your acronyms. Set up a snippet — say a short cue and Flow pastes the full text. I have one for my calendar link and one for my email sign-off. Tiny thing, genuinely useful.

For those of us in India: Flow recently shipped a Hinglish model. The first voice tool that actually handles code-switching between Hindi and English the way we actually speak, not the way we’d speak if we were trying to be transcribed. I tested it. It works. I didn’t think it would, and it did.

The Android news

Flow launched fully on Android in February — not a watered-down version, the real thing. Floats above every app, no keyboard toggling, same accuracy as desktop. Android users get unlimited free dictation for now while they’re rolling it out. If you’ve been on the waitlist, it’s your moment.

Whether it’s worth paying for

The free plan is real — 2,000 words a week on desktop, unlimited on Android. Enough to actually test it, not just demo it.

Pro is $12/month billed annually. Unlimited words, command editing, team features. The 14-day trial is free with no card required, which is the honest way to sell something you believe in. It’s 320 Rs a month in India (annual plan).

I’m an affiliate, so full transparency: I get a small commission if you sign up through my link. I was a paying user first. That order matters to me — I don’t recommend things I haven’t actually used and kept.

Try Flow free for 14 days →

As always — if you try it, I’d genuinely like to know what you think. Hit reply.

— Kaushik

You’re reading Systems & Flow — a weekly letter on productivity systems that actually hold up in the real world. No fluff. Just what works.

Subscribe now

Disclosure: This issue contains an affiliate link. I only recommend tools I use and pay for myself.

I need to tell you something that might surprise you.

After spending years — and I mean *years* — exploring, reviewing, and writing about every note-taking app under the sun, I’ve settled down. Me. The guy who has written about 60+ tools. The one who always had a “but have you tried...” in his back pocket.

I’m using Obsidian. And I’m not looking at anything else.

Let me explain why this feels different.

The fear I carried everywhere

Every notes app I’ve ever used came with an invisible weight. A quiet background anxiety that I could never fully shake off:

*What if this app shuts down? What if they change the pricing? What if the sync breaks and I lose six months of writing?*

I carried this fear through Tana, Capacities, Mem, Reflect — through every tool I explored and sometimes fell in love with. Some of these are genuinely brilliant apps. But none of them could answer that one question in a way that fully calmed me down.

Obsidian did. Not with a feature. Not with a promise. But with a fact: your notes are markdown files on your computer. Period.

If Obsidian disappears tomorrow, I open my folder in any text editor and everything is there. Every essay. Every meeting note. Every chapter of *The Departure*.

I cannot overstate how freeing that feels.

I stopped writing for the machine

Here’s something I didn’t expect.

For the past year or so, I had been unconsciously shaping my writing to work with AI. Structuring notes so assistants could parse them. Thinking about prompts while I was supposed to be thinking about ideas. Writing became a performance for an algorithm instead of an act of expression.

Obsidian has no built-in AI. And the moment I opened it, something shifted. I started writing the way I used to write — messy, personal, exploratory. Not optimized for anything. Just... words.

I missed that. I didn’t even know I missed it until I got it back.

The setup that’s actually sticking

You know me — I’ve built systems in Notion that looked like NASA control rooms. I’ve had Tana supertag hierarchies that needed their own documentation. I’ve over-engineered every system I’ve ever touched.

Not this time.

Here’s my entire Obsidian setup:

Two vaults. One for my writing and learning. One for work — projects, meetings, notes from my team. A handful of plugins, nothing fancy. Obsidian Sync to keep things running between my Windows laptop and my Android phone.

That’s it. No 30-plugin stack. No complex templates. No Data view queries pulling data from seventeen folders.

Just notes. Linked when it makes sense. Written when I have something to say.

It’s the most boring system I’ve ever used. And I think that’s exactly why it’s working.

Everything in one place (finally)

For years, my thoughts were scattered across apps like confetti. A draft in Notion. Meeting notes in Capacities. Ideas in Mem. Random thoughts in Apple Notes because I was too lazy to open the “real” app.

Now everything goes into Obsidian. All my words. One place. The question “where did I write that?” has a single answer now, and you have no idea how much mental bandwidth that frees up.

I have 220+ blog posts, an ocean of atomic essays, and three chapters of my first novel sitting in my vaults. All plain text. All mine. All searchable, linkable, and permanent.

What’s coming next

I’m excited about connecting my Obsidian vault — this growing knowledge base of everything I’ve written and learned — with Claude. Not to replace my thinking. To build on top of it. To find patterns across 220 blog posts I’ve forgotten I wrote. To pull threads between ideas that span years.

The writing happens in Obsidian. The thinking-with-AI happens elsewhere. The boundary matters to me now.

A note for fellow app-hoppers

If you’re reading this and you recognize yourself in my story — the constant switching, the hope that the next app will be “the one,” the low-key anxiety about your notes — I’m not going to tell you Obsidian is the answer for everyone. It’s plain text. It requires you to build your own system. It won’t impress you on day one.

But if what you really want is *confidence* — the deep, quiet certainty that your words are safe and yours — then maybe give it an honest two weeks. Start small. Don’t install twenty plugins. Just write.

See what happens.

I’ll be here, writing about the journey as it unfolds.

Talk soon,

Kausik

*P.S. — If you’ve made a similar move recently, reply to this email. I’d genuinely love to hear your story. These conversations are my favourite part of writing here.*

Hey friends,

I want to tell you about something I’ve been building. But first, a confession.

I have no degree or experience in software building, programming or designing. This prototype is actually an idea that I wanted to further build on and made with Claude and Loveble. If anyone of you would like to share any insights on development idea’s, do share. Every idea and input is welcomed.

I have a problem with to-do lists. Not in the cute, relatable “oh I have so many tasks” way. In the way where I’ve spent actual years of my life shuffling items between apps, color-coding priorities, and architecting elaborate systems that I use enthusiastically for eleven days before abandoning them entirely.

Todoist. Notion. TickTick. Apple Reminders. Things 3. A paper bullet journal. A whiteboard in my office. Sticky notes. The Notes app. Slack messages to myself.

At some point I realized I was spending more time organizing what I needed to do than actually doing any of it. The tool had become the task.

So I asked myself a question that felt almost too simple: What if a productivity app only let you do three things a day?

Three Tasks. Two Check-ins. One Week.

That’s the whole pitch. Let me break it down.

Every morning, you open the app and see three empty slots. Not three categories. Not three projects with sub-items. Three lines. You write down the three things that matter most today, and that’s your morning planning done.

You also get space for a one-line intention (”Stay patient in the afternoon meeting”) and, if you want, loose time blocks for your day. The whole morning check-in is designed to take fifteen minutes. Most days it takes five.

Every evening, you come back for another fifteen minutes. You note what went well, do a quick brain dump of anything still bouncing around your head, write a sentence or two of reflection, and log your mood. Not a score. Just an honest emoji-level check-in with yourself.

Throughout the day, there’s a quick-note capture button — for the ideas, the random thoughts, the “oh I should remember this” moments that normally get lost in twenty different apps. These notes sit quietly until the weekend.

Once a week, everything surfaces in a calm review. Your tasks across all seven days. Your captured notes. Your mood patterns. A space to write a short note to next-week-you.

That’s the entire system.

Why Three?

I tried five. Five felt like a short to-do list. I tried one (the “one big thing” approach). One felt too restrictive on days with genuinely different priorities.

Three is the sweet spot. Small enough to remember without checking your phone. Large enough to cover different areas of your life. And — this is the crucial part — achievable enough that you finish most days feeling like you won.

That last bit matters more than you think. Most task managers are infinite scroll lists. You never reach the bottom. Your day ends not with completion but with a reminder of everything still undone. Three Tasks is designed so that every evening, you look at three checked boxes and think: I did what I set out to do.

The constraint isn’t a bug. It’s the entire product.

The 30-Minute Rule

Here’s my personal rule for Three Tasks: I never spend more than 30 minutes a day inside the app. Fifteen in the morning. Fifteen at night. Maybe a few minutes in between to check something off or capture a note.

This is a direct reaction to what I call the “productivity app trap” — where the tool demands so much maintenance that it becomes its own project. I’ve literally had tasks on my to-do list that said “reorganize to-do list.” If that’s not a sign something is broken, I don’t know what is.

Three Tasks is designed to be the app you open, use, and close. It’s not a second brain. It’s not a life operating system. It’s a daily practice that takes less time than making coffee.

What I’m Stealing From (And What I’m Rejecting)

The design inspiration comes from two apps I deeply admire: Things 3 and Joi Planner.

From Things 3, I’m borrowing the belief that a productivity tool should be beautiful, opinionated, and calm. No visual clutter. No feature bloat. Every pixel earns its place.

From Joi Planner, I’m borrowing the idea that daily planning should feel like a mindfulness practice, not a project management exercise. The morning and evening check-ins are closer to journaling prompts than task management.

What I’m deliberately leaving out is everything else. No folders. No labels. No integrations. No recurring tasks. No AI suggestions. No streaks or gamification. No infinite backlog lurking behind a “Someday” tab.

If something is important enough to do, it’ll be one of your three tasks on the day it matters. If it doesn’t make the cut, that’s useful information too.

The Weekly Review Is the Secret Weapon

Honestly, I think the weekly review is where Three Tasks earns its keep.

Most people I know (myself included) go weeks without stepping back to look at the bigger picture. We’re so busy managing daily fires that we never ask whether we’re even pointed in the right direction.

The Three Tasks weekly review isn’t a performance report. There are no productivity scores. No charts comparing this week to last week. It’s more like flipping through a short journal:

Here’s what you did this week. Here are the notes you captured. Here’s how you felt. What would you tell next-week-you?

That last prompt — “what would you tell next-week-you?” — has become my favorite part of the whole app. It forces a kind of self-honesty that no task manager has ever given me.

Building in Public

The first version of Three Tasks is already live at three-tasks.lovable.app. I built it with Lovable, and it’s rough around the edges. The design will evolve. Features will be added slowly and reluctantly, because the whole point is restraint.

I’m sharing this now not because the app is ready, but because the idea feels ready. And I’m curious whether it resonates with anyone else — whether there are other people out there who are tired of productivity tools that make them feel less productive.

If you want to follow along as I build this, hit subscribe. I’ll share updates here: design decisions, what I’m learning from using it daily, and the inevitable moments where I’m tempted to add “just one more feature” and have to talk myself down.

The TL;DR

I’m building a minimalist daily planner called Three Tasks. The rules are simple:

→ Three tasks per day. No more.
→ Morning check-in: 15 minutes. Set your intention.
→ Evening check-in: 15 minutes. Capture what happened.
→ Quick notes throughout the day for stray thoughts.
→ Weekly review to connect the dots.
→ Total daily time: ~30 minutes.

The thesis is that most of us don’t need better task management. We need less of it — done more intentionally.

If that idea speaks to you, I’d love to hear what your relationship with productivity tools looks like. Reply to this email or leave a comment. I’m genuinely building this based on what feels true, and I want to know if it feels true for you too.

Until next time,

Three tasks. Two check-ins. One calm week.

P.S. — If you try the app, be warned: staring at three empty lines first thing in the morning is more confronting than any 47-item to-do list. In the best possible way.

This one’s been sitting in my drafts for a while, not because I didn’t know what to write, but because I wanted to actually live with both tools long enough to say something honest.

I’ve been burned before — excited about a new app, wrote it up, then quietly stopped using it three months later. Didn’t want to do that to you.

So here’s what I actually think, after paying for both and using them daily across work, personal projects, and everything in between.

Subscribe now

First, the context

Twenty years in industrial sales means I manage a lot. Quotes, specs, client histories, follow-up threads, product documentation, territory notes — the kind of information sprawl that breaks most productivity systems within a month.

I’ve tried nearly everything. The single-app dream always collapses in the same place: the tool that’s great at capturing is never great at creating, and the tool that’s great at deep work can’t keep up with you when you’re in the field.

What I eventually realized is that I wasn’t looking for one tool. I was looking for two tools that knew their lane.

Fabric and Eden, as it turns out, know their lanes.

The honest framing before I get into either tool

Fabric is my resource layer. Eden is my thinking layer.

Everything — work files, personal documents, saved articles, voice memos, client notes — goes into Fabric. It’s my catch-all. Always on, always searchable, always with me.

Eden is where I go to actually produce something. Writing, research, brainstorming, building out a framework. Nothing casual lives there. It’s a workspace I deliberately enter, not a drawer I throw things into.

That split took me an embarrassingly long time to figure out. Once I did, both tools started working properly.

Fabric: The resource layer that actually keeps up

I’ve been using Fabric long enough to remember when it was rougher around the edges. It’s matured significantly. The self-organizing engine means I spend almost no time manually filing — things land, get tagged, become findable. That alone is worth the subscription.

But the part that’s changed my day-to-day most is the AI. It lives alongside my content, not in a separate window I have to switch to. The Fabric Agent can move files, add tags, create notes, run a web search — it operates inside the system rather than sitting on top of it. And Fabric Memory means it’s actually learning over time. It recalls things I didn’t think to look for. That’s gotten useful in ways that are hard to explain until you’ve experienced it.

The other thing I’ll say plainly: the mobile apps are real and they work. iOS and Android, full functionality. My resource layer has to be with me in the field, in the car, between meetings. Fabric passes that test without complaint.

Where it doesn’t excel: It’s not built for the kind of deep, multi-format work session where you need a whiteboard, a draft, and three reference documents open without losing your thread. That’s not a flaw — it’s just not what it’s for.

Eden: The thinking layer built for flow

Eden is newer, still in private beta, and it’s making a bet I think is correct: that the biggest drain on creative and strategic work isn’t disorganization — it’s constant context-switching.

The multi-pane interface sounds like a small thing until you use it. Having your research, your draft, and your brainstorm canvas open simultaneously in one window — without tab-hopping, without losing your place — changes the texture of a work session. I didn’t realize how much mental energy I was spending just relocating myself between tools until I stopped having to do it.

The whiteboard being native rather than a separate app is the other big one for me. I think visually before I write linearly. Having that flow — sketch out the structure, then write into it — in a single workspace has cut the time between “thinking about writing this” and “actually writing this” by more than I expected.

Projects are Eden’s sharpest feature. Your general workspace holds everything, but a project is a curated slice — only the content relevant to this piece of work. The AI operates within that scope. It’s not wading through your entire knowledge base when you ask it something specific. That focus shows.

One more thing that matters: the AI is agentic and undoable. It takes action — creates files, organizes folders, runs searches — and if it gets something wrong, you can undo it. That “undo” sounds minor. It’s actually the thing that makes me willing to let it act at all.

The real limitation: Web only, right now. I don’t send Eden out into the field with me because I can’t. It’s a desk tool. For deep work sessions, that’s fine. For capture on the go, it’s not in the running.

How the two actually work together day-to-day

In practice, the split is clean:

Into Fabric: everything I want to keep. Work documents, client notes, voice memos from the car, research I might need later, meeting notes. If I’m capturing something, it goes to Fabric. The mobile apps make this feel effortless.

Into Eden: active projects only. When I sit down to write, build out a framework, or do serious research — I open Eden, load the relevant project, and stay there. The whiteboard is where the thinking starts. The multi-pane view is where it develops. The draft is where it lands.

No duplication, no confusion. Fabric is input. Eden is output. The two don’t step on each other because they’re not trying to do the same job.

Which one should you actually try?

Start with Fabric if you need something working today across all your devices and your information is currently scattered across too many places to find anything reliably. It’s the more mature product and the mobile apps are essential.

Get on Eden’s waitlist if you do serious desk-based creative or strategic work and context-switching is genuinely costing you time and focus. It’s worth the wait.

Run both if you want a capture system that’s always available and a creative workspace that’s actually built for depth. There’s no overlap to manage — just two tools, two jobs.

Disclosure: I’m a Fabric affiliate. I was a paying customer before I was an affiliate, and that hasn’t changed. The opinions here are my own.

The full write-up with the side-by-side breakdown is on Medium if you want the complete comparison.

Until next week —

Kaushik—SystemsAndFlow

Hey there,

I need to tell you about something that’s been quietly revolutionizing how I work.

You know I don’t get excited easily. I’ve tested 55+ productivity apps. Most get uninstalled within a month. A few stick around. And only a handful become indispensable.

Fabric just joined that elite group (with 3 years of paid commitment from myside)—and the recent updates are why.\

Subscribe now

The Problem I Couldn’t Solve

For years, I’ve struggled with the same issue you probably face:

Information overload without information access.

I’d save articles, bookmark resources, take meeting notes, and capture ideas. But when I actually needed that information? Good luck finding it.

My workflow was scattered:

• Meeting notes in Apple Notes/Tana

• Research in Eden (a good option though)

• Files in Google Drive

• Tasks in Todoist

• Voice memos in... wherever my phone decided to save them (Mostly Tana)

Every tool promised to be “the one.” None delivered.

Then Fabric released updates that changed everything.

What’s New (And Why You Should Care)

1. Fabric Agent: AI That Actually Does Things

Forget chatbots that just answer questions. The Fabric Agent takes action:

• Moves and renames files

• Adds tags automatically

• Creates and edits notes

• Deletes items you don’t need

Real-world impact: I used to spend 15 minutes every morning organizing captures from the previous day. Now I tell the Agent, “Organize yesterday’s meeting notes by project,” and it’s done in 10 seconds.

This is the difference between AI theater and AI utility.

2. Fabric Memory: An AI That Learns You

The Agent now creates “memories” based on your work patterns and preferences.

Tell it once that you prefer summaries in bullet points? It remembers. Mention a project deadline? It tracks it. Share how you organize files? It applies that going forward.

The kicker: You can tell it to forget things too. Privacy meets personalization.

How I use it: I told Fabric I’m writing a newsletter for sales managers and field operators. Now every summary, every idea generation, every research output is automatically tailored to that audience.

No more generic AI responses. Just relevant, contextualized intelligence.

3. Assistant Web Search: Real-Time Intelligence

The Assistant can now search the web, fetch results, and analyze them—all inside your workspace.

Example: I was researching competitor features for a blog post. Instead of opening 15 tabs, I asked Fabric: “Research the latest updates from Notion and Capacities.”

It pulled the data, summarized it, and saved it to my workspace. Five minutes. Done.

4. Tasks: Action Meets Context

You can now create tasks in Fabric with:

• Due dates and reminders

• Priority levels

• Connected files and folders

The workflow shift: I’m reviewing a contract PDF. I spot three action items. I create tasks, link the PDF, and set reminders—all without leaving Fabric.

When the reminder hits, I have instant context. No more “What was this about again?”

5. Meeting Notes 2.0: The Feature I Didn’t Know I Needed

This is where Fabric becomes indispensable:

• Real-time transcription as the meeting happens

• Search conversations during the meeting (find that stat someone mentioned 20 minutes ago)

• Instant post-meeting summaries with customizable templates

• Add notes before, during, and after—all incorporated into the AI summary

My workflow:

1. Prep meeting notes with agenda items

2. Fabric transcribes the conversation in real-time

3. I add follow-up thoughts after

4. AI generates a summary that includes prep, transcript, and my notes

One document. Complete context. Zero manual work.

6. New Desktop UI: Faster, Cleaner, Smarter

The interface got a complete redesign:

• Minimal aesthetic that reduces clutter

• Assistant opens alongside your library

• Contextual actions right where you need them

• Faster file launching and note creation

What I noticed: The old UI felt like a tool. The new one feels like an extension of my thinking.

7. @Mentions: Collaboration Without Chaos

Tag teammates in comments on files or folders. They get in-app notifications.

For teams: This turns Fabric from a personal workspace into a collaborative hub. Review a proposal, @mention your colleague, keep the conversation attached to the work.

8. Bin and Recovery: Peace of Mind

Deleted items go to a bin for 30 days. Accidentally deleted something? Recover it instantly.

Why it matters: I’m more willing to delete aggressively now, knowing I have a safety net.

Why This Matters

Here’s what separates Fabric from every other productivity app I’ve tested:

It doesn’t just store information—it makes information useful.

Most apps are digital filing cabinets. Fabric is a thinking partner.

The Agent doesn’t just answer questions—it takes action.

The Memory feature doesn’t just recall facts—it learns your preferences.

The Meeting Notes don’t just transcribe—they synthesize.

This is what I’ve been searching for: a tool that reduces friction between capturing information and using it.

The Test

I have one test for every productivity app:

If it disappeared tomorrow, would I panic?

For Fabric, the answer is yes.

It’s where I:

• Capture meeting notes and voice memos

• Store research and articles

• Organize project files

• Create tasks with full context

• Collaborate with my team

And now, with the Agent, Memory, and Web Search, it’s where I think and act—not just store.

And yes, the app (iOS & Android) both are usable and I use all the time on the go for idea capture and creation both.

Should You Try It?

You’ll love Fabric if you:

• Attend multiple meetings daily

• Collect research but struggle to find it later

• Want AI that does things instead of just talking

• Need a unified workspace for tasks, files, notes, and conversations

You might want to wait if you:

• Prefer highly structured, database-driven tools (like Notion)

• Need advanced project management features

• Work primarily offline

Final Thoughts

I’ve written four blog posts about Fabric. I’m an affiliate. I’ve tested it for months.

And I can say this without hesitation:

Fabric isn’t just another app. It’s the workspace I didn’t know I needed—until I couldn’t work without it.

If you’re drowning in information but starving for insight, give it a try.

👉 Try Fabric here (affiliate link—I earn a small commission if you subscribe, at no extra cost to you)

What’s your biggest challenge with managing digital information? Hit reply—I read every response.

Until next time,

Kaushik—SystemsAndFlow

P.S. If you found this helpful, forward it to someone who’s drowning in digital clutter. They’ll thank you.

Subscribe now

The search for the perfect creative workspace feels like a never-ending cycle. I’ve cycled through note-taking apps, project management tools, and writing platforms — each promising to be the “one place for everything,” yet each eventually becoming another tab I forget to close.

Then I discovered Eden (Yes, after using Kortex extensively till the day I can on-board Eden)

What started as a casual exploration quickly became something more significant. Eden isn’t trying to be another all-in-one productivity suite. It’s deliberately designed for how creatives actually work — and that’s exactly what makes it different.

Subscribe now

What Eden Gets Right

A Workspace That Respects Your Flow

Most productivity tools force you into their structure. Eden adapts to yours. The multi-pane interface lets you work on multiple documents simultaneously — draft a blog post in one pane while referencing research in another, without the cognitive whiplash of constant tab-switching.

For content creators juggling multiple projects, this isn’t just convenient — it’s transformative. I can keep my editorial calendar visible while drafting posts, or have client briefs open alongside my work in progress.

Features: Eden

Features: Eden

AI That Feels Like a Creative Partner, Not a Replacement

We’ve all experienced AI features that feel bolted on — impressive demos that rarely make it into actual workflow. Eden’s AI integration is different. It’s embedded from the ground up, designed to amplify your creative process rather than replace it.

The Snippets feature lets you template frequently-used prompts and content blocks. For someone who writes regularly, this means less time formatting and more time creating. The AI assists without getting in the way — suggesting when helpful, silent when not.

Visual Thinking, Seamlessly Integrated

Creatives don’t think linearly (I think I am one of them). Ideas emerge as webs, clusters, and sudden connections. Eden’s integrated whiteboard acknowledges this reality. You can brainstorm visually, map out content structures, or sketch concepts without leaving your workspace.

For business executives planning strategy or content creators mapping editorial calendars, this visual layer bridges the gap between ideation and execution. No more copying ideas from a separate whiteboard app into your documents.

Everything in One Place, Finally

Eden handles notes, images, videos, and links natively. Import a YouTube video for reference, embed images directly into your drafts, or save web links with context. Your research lives alongside your creation, not in a separate browser tab you’ll never find again.

The interface remains responsive and quick — no laggy loading, no spinning wheels when you’re trying to capture a fleeting idea. In my experience, this responsiveness is rare. Most “all-in-one” tools sacrifice speed for features. Eden doesn’t.

I have just started getting into the new features; Projects. The idea is to use workspace be the place I store files and let projects be the place I do the work.

Projects: Eden

Who Eden Is For

Eden isn’t trying to be everything to everyone — and that’s its strength.

Perfect for:

• Content creators who need to research, draft, and organize in one fluid workflow

• Writers who want AI assistance without losing their voice

• Solo business owners managing multiple projects and client work

• Executives who think visually and need quick access to diverse information types

• Anyone tired of app-hopping between notes, tasks, whiteboards, and documents

Consider alternatives if:

• You need heavy-duty project management with Gantt charts and resource allocation

• You prefer rigid, structured workflows over flexible, non-linear creation

• You want a tool focused purely on one function (just writing, just whiteboarding)

The Bottom Line

After testing dozens of productivity and creative tools, I’ve developed a simple litmus test: Does this tool get out of my way and let me do my best work?

Eden passes that test.

It’s not perfect — no tool is. It’s currently in private beta, and some features are still evolving. But what’s there already demonstrates a clear vision: a workspace designed for how creatives actually think and work, not how productivity gurus say we should.

The transition from Kortex (Eden’s predecessor) was seamless. Within a day, I had moved my content over and was working productively. Now, weeks later, Eden has become my single source of truth — the place where ideas become drafts, research becomes content, and scattered thoughts become cohesive projects.

If you’re a content creator, writer, or solo business owner searching for a tool that doesn’t just store your work but amplifies it, Eden deserves your attention.

Join the waitlist. When you get access, move your content in. Give it a genuine try — not just a surface-level exploration, but a real workflow test.

Pricing: Accessible for Every Creative

Eden offers flexible pricing to match where you are in your creative journey:

Free Plan: Perfect for getting started and exploring what Eden offers. Try it out, see if it fits your workflow, and experience the interface before committing.

Starter — $14/month: Ideal for individual creatives who want more power and features as they build their practice.

Creator — $29/month: Built for individual creators and small teams who are serious about their content creation and need robust collaboration features.

Pro — $83/month: For individuals and teams who need the full power of Eden for professional content creation at scale.

You might just find, as I did, that you’ve finally arrived home.

What’s your biggest frustration with your current creative workspace? Are you still app-hopping between notes, drafts, and whiteboards? Share your experience in the comments — I’d love to hear how others are solving (or struggling with) this challenge.

— Astu

Share

I never thought I’d be writing this post.

For years, Sunsama has been my ride-or-die productivity companion. The daily planning rituals, the shutdown routines, the intentional approach to work — it all clicked with how my brain operates. But lately, I’ve been sneaking glances at another app. And honestly? I think I’m ready to make the switch.

The culprit? My phone. And a little thing called AI.

Subscribe now

The Mobile Problem I Couldn’t Ignore Anymore

Here’s the thing about productivity systems: they only work if you can actually use them. And for me, that means using them everywhere — at my desk, on the couch, waiting in line for coffee, or lying in bed at 11pm when I suddenly remember I forgot to reschedule tomorrow’s dentist appointment.

Sunsama’s mobile experience has been… let’s call it “a work in progress.” For years. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve opened the app only to wrestle with syncing issues or clunky interfaces that made a simple task feel like defusing a bomb.

Enter Morgen.

Image Courtesy: Morgen

Image courtesy; Author

The first time I opened Morgen’s mobile app, I actually said “oh” out loud. It’s polished. It’s functional. And — most importantly — it just works. I can update recurring events without the app throwing a tantrum. I can edit meeting participants on the fly. The tablet view is actually optimized for tablets (revolutionary concept, I know).

It sounds like a small thing, but when your entire productivity system hinges on being able to capture and adjust tasks in the moment, mobile reliability isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s everything.

AI That Actually Helps (Without Being Annoying)

I’ll be honest — I’ve been burned by “AI-powered” productivity tools before. Usually it’s just a fancy label slapped on basic automation, or worse, an overeager assistant that creates more chaos than it solves.

Morgen’s AI is different. It feels less like a robot and more like having a thoughtful friend who happens to be really good at scheduling.

Here’s what I mean:

Smart Reprioritization: When my calendar inevitably explodes (because whose doesn’t?), Morgen’s AI evaluates my actual capacity and helps reschedule tasks intelligently. It doesn’t just bump everything to tomorrow — it thinks about what matters and when I realistically have time.

At-Risk Task Highlighting: The AI flags tasks that might slip based on my current workload. It’s like having someone tap me on the shoulder and say, “Hey, you might want to look at this before it becomes a problem.”

Unfinished Work That Follows You: Didn’t finish something today? It automatically carries forward. No more tasks disappearing into the void because I forgot to manually reschedule them.

But the feature that really sold me? Frames.

Frames: The Feature I Didn’t Know I Needed

Frames lets you define what your ideal week actually looks like. You set up blocks for different types of work — deep focus time, meetings, admin tasks, creative work — and the AI optimizes your schedule within those boundaries.

So when I tell Morgen “I do my best writing in the morning” and “please don’t schedule meetings before 10am,” it actually listens. And then it gives me live, preview-able recommendations that respect those preferences.

It’s the difference between an AI that imposes its will on your calendar and one that learns how you work best. I’m still in the driver’s seat. The AI is just a really good navigator.

What I’ll Miss About Sunsama

I’m not going to pretend this is an easy decision. Sunsama’s mindful approach to productivity genuinely changed how I think about work. The daily planning ritual, the end-of-day reflection, the emphasis on intentionality over just checking boxes — that philosophy matters to me.

And there’s the muscle memory factor. After years with one tool, switching means relearning habits. That’s not nothing.

But here’s what I keep coming back to: a productivity system is only as good as its weakest link. And for me, that weak link has been mobile reliability and intelligent assistance when things get chaotic.

The Verdict (For Now)

I’m still in what I’d call the “evaluation phase” — running both tools side by side to make sure Morgen is the right long-term fit. But I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t already leaning heavily toward making the full switch.

Morgen’s core promise — that your time shouldn’t be scattered across a dozen apps — resonated with me immediately. Add in the rock-solid mobile experience and AI that actually earns its keep, and it’s becoming harder to justify staying with what I know just because it’s familiar.

If you’ve been frustrated by mobile productivity apps that feel like afterthoughts, or if you’re curious about AI scheduling that doesn’t feel like handing your calendar to a chaos gremlin, Morgen is worth a serious look.

Sometimes the best productivity hack isn’t a new system or framework. It’s just finding a tool that works the way you do.

Have you made the switch from Sunsama to Morgen (or vice versa)? I’d love to hear about your experience in the comments.

Thanks for reading.

See you next week with the recent updates of Fabric.so

Keep reading, Keep sharing.

Stay Productive,

-SystemsAndFlow

P.S. If you’re happy with Sunsama and the mobile app works for you, genuinely—stick with it. This isn’t about one tool being “better.” It’s about finding what works for your specific workflow. For me, that’s changed. And that’s okay.

Hey there,

I have a confession: I was a productivity junkie.

I’d download an app, use it for two weeks, get bored, and move on to the next shiny thing. Rinse and repeat. My calendar was a disaster. My to-do list was a graveyard. And I was exhausted.

Then, two years ago, I found Sunsama. And it broke the cycle.

Not because it’s fancy. Not because it has a million features. But because it taught me something counterintuitive: the fastest way to speed up is to slow down.

Here’s what changed:

The Daily Ritual Every morning, I spend 10 minutes asking: “What actually matters today?” That’s it. That simple question rewired how I work.

The Weekly Review Every Friday, I review the week and design the next one. This became my anchor—the moment I remember I’m in control, not my inbox.

The Breathing Room When you stop dumping every task into your calendar and start being intentional, something magical happens: your day has space. You can actually think.

The Results

• 5+ hours reclaimed per week

• Stress went from “perpetually behind” to “in control”

• Quality of work improved dramatically

• Sleep got better. Anxiety went down. Joy went up.

The honest truth? Sunsama isn’t for everyone. It’s for people tired of the productivity hamster wheel. People who want to work smarter, not just harder.

If that’s you, I wrote a full breakdown of my 2-year journey [my blog]. It includes my exact system, the framework that works, and why this tool is different from every other planner I’ve tried.

Your future self will thank you.

Talk soon,
Kaushik

P.S. — I use Sunsama every single day. If you decide to try it, [here’s my link]. I get a small commission, but more importantly, I genuinely believe it’ll change how you work.